"Oblivion" begins with a voiceover describing the end of
the world. Tom Cruise, who once again plays a man named Jack, delivers a bland
monologue, which works much better when it is explained in a scene later on.
Jack, along with Victoria (Andrea Riseborough) are part of a "mop-up
crew" who stay in a swanky apartment (as described above) and are assigned
to patrol what remains of Earth. Writer-Director Joseph Kosinski decided to hit
Earth with a whole array of disasters: aliens invade, the moon is destroyed,
and earthquakes and tsunamis tear the world asunder. The best thing that can be
said about "Oblivion" is how striking and well thought out the world looks.
While the set design is stale, the world is well detailed. The creative minds
behind this film certainly spend a lot of time thinking about the end of the
world.
However, if the film's poster reminded you a lot of "I Am
Legend," that's because
the two films are a little too close for comfort. "Oblivion" feels
like a mash up of a lot of sci-fi films, both great and mediocre. The film's
main villain (or at least I think it is, more on that soon) evokes a much less
frightening version of HAL from "2001: A Space Odyssey." Also, the
film's use of paintings and old texts for blatant symbolism felt like "The
Book Of Eli," another post-apocalyptic film with a lot of problems.
“Oblivion” is derivative of films that were derivative of other films.
While people like to give Tom Cruise flack, there's a reason the
man became so big in the first place: he is an incredibly talented actor who
can take on Spielberg blockbusters and Cameron Crowe romances. At his best,
Cruise can feel like an everyman even though he is clearly a movie star. At his
worst, he is distant and unemotional. The latter describes his performance in
"Oblivion." While he is supposed to be a cold, highly trained killer
here, he didn't even make sense as that. For somebody with such a haunted and
confused past, it clearly didn't seem to bother him at all.
The biggest problem that "Oblivion" faces is a script
filled with stilted dialogue and underdeveloped characters. Just look at the
Morgan Freeman. He comes in, almost saves the movie, and then
disappears again for an hour. They say that a movie is as good as its
villain. Jack and the resistance spend most of "Oblivion" fighting a
bunch of orbs that shoot things out of them. And that's about it. There are no
confrontations or motivations to create intrigue or raise the stakes. A better
villain probably would have made "Oblivion" more entertaining.
The film’s villain problem highlights the real issue of
“Oblivion”: it’s just plain boring. The action sequences
have absolutely no life in them. With all of the money spent on this
film, couldn't there have been a little more life injected into them? Every
battle feels like it was won with no difficulty at all. The director seems to
enjoy taking every convenience possible whenever a storyline can't work out
(for example: Jack's bike breaking down).
"Oblivion" is set to a score that sounds like the
"Inception" soundtrack mixed with the music from those Carnival
Cruise commercials. This is just a small example of the film's inability to
both find the right tone and faithfully pay tribute to the much better films
than it rips off. I really wanted to like "Oblivion," because every
original sci-fi film that Hollywood produces is a mini blessing in disguise.
Maybe it sold because it wasn’t so original after all. What
"Oblivion" lacks is spirit. You could get a lot more entertainment out
of watching a group of five-year-olds reenact their favorite scenes from
"Minority Report."
Note: There are multiple story lines that I didn't get into.
That is partly because I don't want to spoil anything, and partly because I had
barely any idea what was going on at all during this film.
If
You Don’t Want to See the Watered Down Version, See the Original: Moon, Source Code, Minority Report, 2001: A Space Odyssey,
Inception, Cloud Atlas, Looper
No comments:
Post a Comment